ActionWell ActionWell
Assess my portfolio
Assess my portfolio
Illustration of an oilfield at dusk: pumpjacks on lit well pads, linked by gathering lines to a processing facility, with more pads stretching to the horizon.

The opportunity in existing oil wells

Up to 10% more oil. Up to 2× operating profit.

ActionWell finds hidden production opportunities across your portfolio and ranks where to act.

Assess my portfolio
See ActionWell in 30 seconds.0:30 · Recorded product workflow on public data

The opportunity in your existing assets

A portfolio total cannot tell you where to act

A field can look stable while its production base changes. A well can look weak until its operating history explains why. Across hundreds or thousands of wells, these patterns compete for engineering attention.

ActionWell connects the evidence so your team can focus on the production opportunities worth pursuing.

Illustration of accumulated operating records: stacks of reports and binders, folded well logs, production printouts and technical drawings.

How ActionWell works

Evidence becomes a ranked set of production opportunities

  1. Connect the evidence

    Bring well histories and engineering context into the same investigation.

  2. Compare the next actions

    Assess possible responses and the information needed to choose between them.

  3. Keep the engineering judgment

    Preserve the decision, the reasoning and the corrections that can guide future work.

Our goal is continuous engineering review across your producing portfolio.

North Dakota research

Stable production concealed a changing base

The field total rose 1.3%. The other 35 producing wells declined 22%. One well’s increase masked the difference.

The planning question: how much of that increase will last?

Public-record research; field and well names hidden. Monthly production reports, July 2025–June 2026 against the prior twelve months.

Explore the platform
Asset A: field oil 214,539 → 217,285 bbl, bridged by well A-1 (+47,373) and the other 35 producers (−44,627, −22%); decision supported: production planning. Watch the two-minute investigationFrom a signal to a decision · 1:54

Why the upside matters

More value from the wells you already operate

Existing infrastructure gives additional production outsized profit potential. ActionWell helps your team find the opportunities, compare feasible responses and prioritize the work that pays.

Engineering knowledge

A useful correction should keep working

An engineer corrects an assumption. ActionWell keeps the reason and where it applies. Relevant analyses can use that judgment while reviewed decisions remain traceable.

See the correction carry across a group of wells.

Explore the engineering
Well C-1, reported oil per calendar day: the corrected window January 2018 to April 2019 with its own recalculated curve, beside the engineer’s reason, “Separate the later production interval.” Watch the 90-second workflowRecorded product workflow · Demo engineer · 1:30

Start with your asset

See what your portfolio deserves next

For selected early partners, we offer a free assessment of one agreed asset. Your team brings the operating context. Together, we identify priority cases, the evidence needed to act and the economics of feasible responses.

Assess my portfolio Download the one-pager (PDF, 0.7 MB)
The opportunity in existing oil wells · 0:30Recorded product workflow · Demo engineer
Transcript: on-screen findings and narration
  1. The opportunity in existing oil wells: Up to 10% more oil. Up to 2× operating profit. The opportunity in existing oil wells: up to ten percent more oil. Up to double operating profit.
  2. Production columns: reported oil, Jul 2025–Jun 2026; color shows the change vs the prior year (within ±2% neutral). Recorded example · well C-1 · oil: automatic analysis, not reviewed. ActionWell finds hidden production opportunities across your portfolio and ranks where to act.
  3. Well C-1 · reported oil per calendar day, every month. Automatic intervals: 2016–17, 2018–25. Evidence · change screen: May 2019, a sustained rise to a new level, ×1.82. Separate the later production interval. The window’s edge moves: selected window Jan 2018–Aug 2025 → corrected window Jan 2018–Apr 2019. Data · public monthly reports. Connect the production history. Inspect the evidence. Focus your engineers on the wells that deserve attention.
  4. Where the reasoning applies (this recorded example): 12 wells checked · updated: 7 wells, each at its own change · protected: 1 reviewed result kept, with a notice · not applicable: 4 wells without such a change. Saved as a provisional rule · engineering endorsement: none. Keep their judgment working across the portfolio.
  5. Start with one asset. Assess my portfolio. actionwell.com Start with one asset. Assess your portfolio with ActionWell.
From a signal to a decision · 1:54Public-record research · Asset names hidden
Transcript: on-screen findings and narration
  1. Which production changes deserve engineering time — and which justify spending money? Which production changes deserve engineering time, and which justify spending money? The answer starts with the evidence behind each well.
  2. Asset A: production columns (reported oil, Jul 2025–Jun 2026; color: change vs prior year). Field total +1.3% (214,539 → 217,285 bbl). Well A-1: +47,373 bbl. ActionWell connects production patterns with the evidence needed to evaluate those decisions. Start above the asset: the map already shows where performance differs.
  3. Asset A · field oil, twelve months each. Here, field production rose just over one percent.
  4. 214,539 bbl → well A-1 +47,373 → other 35 producers, together, −44,627 (−22%) → 217,285 bbl. Decision supported: production planning. Can the concentrated increase be sustained? But one well added more than forty-seven thousand barrels while the other thirty-five producers together declined twenty-two percent. The planning question is whether that concentrated increase can be sustained.
  5. Missing discriminator · operating history of well A-1: +47,373 bbl = 59,017 bbl (Jul 2025–Jun 2026) − 11,644 bbl (Jul 2024–Jun 2025). Source: monthly production reports; well work and allocation records not yet in hand. Before relying on the field total: separate the underlying trend from the concentrated increase. Review its operating history and separate the underlying trend before relying on the field total.
  6. Regional view on the way to Asset B (reported oil −20.7% vs prior year). The second asset raises a different spending question.
  7. Asset B · oil per producing day, April 2026 vs baseline (Jul–Dec 2025): B-1 17 → 84, B-2 15 → 84, B-3 21 → 66, B-4 16 → 1.5. Three wells rose while a fourth fell.
  8. Four wells, one scale, bbl per producing day. Dated nearby activity: completions N-1–N-5, Feb 27–Mar 10, 2026, 1.03–1.06 km from B-2 (surface distance) · timing overlaps the rate step. Cause unresolved · timing alone does not establish a cause. A nearby completion overlaps the period, but timing alone does not establish the cause.
  9. The months after April (three windows, not a monthly history): in Aug 2026, B-1 52, B-2 29, B-3 40 and B-4 55 bbl per producing day — B-4 16 → 1.5 → 55. Decision supported: reassess the case for remedial work. Is the April decline a continuing problem? Reconcile first: well tests · work history · allocation. By August, the fourth well was above its earlier producing-day rate. If you are considering remedial work, that later evidence belongs in the decision. Reconcile tests, work history, and allocation before treating the April decline as a continuing problem.
  10. Assessment goal — the next stage, with owner records: owner records → qualified options (feasible actions, including doing nothing) → costs and uncertainty → engineering review → owner decision. A target workflow · no estimate or outcome is shown here. With owner records, the next stage is to compare feasible actions, expected production response, costs, and uncertainty. Engineers review the technical case; owners decide what to fund.
  11. Asset A · decision supported: plan production with the base trend visible (evidence still needed: operating history of the uplift). Asset B · decision supported: review current evidence before funding remedial work (evidence still needed: well tests, work history and allocation). One case informs the production plan. The other informs whether work is justified.
  12. ActionWell finds hidden production opportunities across your portfolio. Start with one asset. actionwell.com ActionWell finds hidden production opportunities across your portfolio. Start with one asset.
Keep the reason, improve the next review · 1:30Recorded product workflow · Demo engineer
Transcript: on-screen findings and narration
  1. Production columns: reported oil, Jul 2025–Jun 2026; color shows the change vs the prior year (within ±2% neutral). Recorded example · well C-1 · oil: automatic analysis, not reviewed. A production history can contain several distinct intervals. Each needs to be understood in its own context.
  2. Well C-1 · reported oil per calendar day, every month (bbl per calendar day; full history 2014–2026). Automatic intervals: 2015, 2016–17, 2018–25. Selected window: Jan 2018–Aug 2025. Data · public monthly reports. ActionWell identifies candidate intervals automatically. The engineer can inspect the evidence and the analysis within each one.
  3. What is wrong with this window: one curve spans 88 months; production behavior changes inside the window. Evidence · change screen: from May 2019, a sustained rise to a new level, ×1.82 against Sep 2018–Apr 2019. Here, one window includes observations that follow a different production trend.
  4. Separate the later production interval. The engineer’s correction (demo profile, fictional): “End this window at the production change. The later observations follow a different trend and should be analyzed separately.” The observations after the change are ringed; the window’s right edge moves to the change (corrected window). The engineer explains the correction: end this window at the change and analyze the later interval separately.
  5. Recalculated: window Jan 2018–Apr 2019 · 16 observations · a descriptive curve, not a forecast. The other intervals stay visible. The boundary moves. The selected analysis updates, while the full history and the other intervals remain visible.
  6. Saved with the correction · read back from the record: the reason (the engineer’s words, kept verbatim); the evidence (a sustained change of level at May 2019, from the window’s own change screen); what changed (window revision 1: the end moves from Aug 2025 to Apr 2019). Demo profile, fictional · local, unauthenticated. ActionWell keeps the correction together with its reason and supporting evidence. The next review can trace exactly what changed and why.
  7. Another well, C-11 · the same reasoning, its own evidence: a sustained rise from Dec 2023 (×2.22); its window now ends Nov 2023, before its own change (provisional, awaiting review). Protected · reviewed well C-2: its reviewed result is kept; an impact notice asks a person to compare. On another relevant well, that reasoning guides the review. The boundary comes from that well’s evidence. Reviewed results stay protected.
  8. Where the reasoning applies (this recorded example): 12 wells checked · updated: 7 wells, each at its own change · protected: 1 reviewed result kept, with a notice · not applicable: 4 wells without such a change. Saved as a provisional rule · engineering endorsement: none. This is how engineering judgment becomes useful across a portfolio: the team keeps the reasoning and applies it where it fits.
  9. ActionWell. Keep the reason. Improve the next review. Assess my portfolio. actionwell.com ActionWell. Keep the reason. Improve the next review.